getaway 27-08-2005 - Nude Wedding

Post Reply
User avatar
squid
Respected Uploader
Posts: 129
Joined: Wed May 28, 2003 5:49 pm
Has thanked: 469 times
Been thanked: 728 times

getaway 27-08-2005 - Nude Wedding

Post by squid » Sun Aug 28, 2005 2:13 pm

getaway 18-08-2005
Image Image Image
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Thanos76
Forum contributor
Posts: 37
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2004 1:26 am
Has thanked: 2 times

Post by Thanos76 » Mon Aug 29, 2005 1:43 am

seems a little short but nice :) thnaks

User avatar
squid
Respected Uploader
Posts: 129
Joined: Wed May 28, 2003 5:49 pm
Has thanked: 469 times
Been thanked: 728 times

Post by squid » Mon Aug 29, 2005 1:41 pm

what makes you say it is short? it was never intended to be an epic I don't think. It's not even my capture. If you mean it seems short because it is a 12 megabyte file that only goes for 27 seconds then that is because it is in .mpeg format (catnude.mpeg). I uploaded the same file again but compressed using DivX. It is roughly a quarter of the original .mpeg size and has no noticable loss of visual quality. Both files are 1024x576 pixels in window size as well. You might ask why upload an .mpeg then instead of the DivX compressed .avi. Answer is simple, .mpeg videos do not require a codec to be installed so that you can view them. The DivX .avi file requires installation of the DivX codec on your computer so that you can view files of that type. If you ever want to convert an mpeg file to divx just do a google search, you will find a thousand and one free applications online that will do that for you because .mpegs are the most convertible filetypes available. If your into audio then an .mpeg compared to a .avi is pretty much the same as comparing a .wav to a .mp3. I don't pretend to be a video guru, this is just what i've picked up along the way
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Thanos76
Forum contributor
Posts: 37
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2004 1:26 am
Has thanked: 2 times

Post by Thanos76 » Mon Aug 29, 2005 1:55 pm

hehe just seemed like there was more to it and the way the footage just ends and the promo comes in seems like it was pruned of certain footage.. not having a go at you.. you'd know if i was :)

User avatar
mr_poo
Respected Uploader
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:32 pm
Has thanked: 32 times
Been thanked: 84 times

Post by mr_poo » Mon Aug 29, 2005 2:42 pm

The nude wedding part was aired for a short time.

It was pruned of the boring and pointless parts.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Catriona Rowntree”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests